<\/a><\/p>\n We complain regularly that the news is so negative<\/a>, yet we continue like lemmings to follow it. The war in Ukraine makes us captive to the horrors journalists regularly present to us. Are news purveyors basically exploiting such people? Or are viewers all condemned to negativity bias<\/a>, the condition in which negative events and statements impact our brains more powerfully than positive ones? Mainstream news surely caters to this bias.<\/p>\n A couple of years ago, Time magazine wrote this<\/a>:<\/p>\n More than half of Americans say the news causes them stress, and many report feeling anxiety, fatigue or sleep loss as a result, the survey shows. Yet one in 10 adults checks the news every hour, and fully 20% of Americans report \u201cconstantly\u201d monitoring their social media feeds\u2014which often exposes them to the latest news headlines, whether they like it or not.<\/p>\n Well, you may say, the negative response has always been part of being human. As Mel Brooks the 2000-year-old cave dweller would say, \u201cGrab that stone and kill the lion.\u201d Journalists are not lion killers, but writing about the Ukraine horrors\u2014and showing us graphic images\u2014makes them feel in control of events that are beyond control. They seem to think that they are giving us a handle on the indescribable.<\/p>\n Last week CNN\u2019s Anderson Cooper devoted much of one show to interviewing bereaved Ukrainian mothers and family of those who had been tortured or killed. One after the other we heard their tales of woe and worse. I got very upset watching this and finally turned it off. It was another of the many cases of tear-jerking emotional overkill that too often are part of the news now.<\/p>\n As a one-time literature professor, I call this sentimentalism<\/em>. Which I take to mean emotion called up by manipulation, emotion provoked in excess of the situation. Too much of our news dwells on these poor grief-stricken people and their stories at the expense of generating a true response, which should be sympathy<\/em>. Their pain is obvious yet news people keep dwelling on it.<\/p>\n What they should be showing\u2014and generating in us\u2014is compassion. Reporters like CNN\u2019s Clarissa Ward are better at that than cold fish like Anderson Cooper or the platitudes of Wolf Blitzer. CNN\u2019s news format is partly to blame, as it makes these horror stories part of almost every troubling evening news report.<\/p>\n