Trump: Americans Who Died in War Are ‘Losers’ and ‘Suckers’
Did Trump call US war dead “losers” and “suckers”? The controversy, explained.
Trump Faces Uproar Over Reported Remarks Disparaging Fallen Soldiers
The story, all over the media for the last four days, pits Trump’s denials against the comments of several anonymous but respected (even by Fox News) sources. Vox comments:
Four reputable news outlets, all citing anonymous sources, report President Donald Trump disparaged US troops, veterans, and missing service members, with several outlets reporting he has called military members “losers.” Yet the president, along with current and former staff on the record, continues to dispute those stories.
The reporting is explosive. The denials are emphatic. And the consequences are potentially enormous.
This is proving to be a Big Story because the last thing you want to do as president is insult the U.S. military. It’s the third rail of presidential politics. It has been pro forma for every president to praise, if not worship, the military. Trump’s gaffe may end up costing him the election since the millions of active duty, reserve, retired and disabled service members are not going to take his comments lightly.
I think the perpetual praise of the military has often verged on idolatry, causing bloated budgets and sometimes reckless decisions. How did you like Teddy Roosevelt’s blustering adventures? Reagan’s invasion of Grenada?
I’d always had a kind of left-wing reaction to the military until I went to work for the Navy. I spent three years doing PR and communications for NAVAIR, the Naval Air Systems Command (which develops, procures, repairs and tests all U.S. Naval aircraft and weapons systems). It was a rewarding and sometimes trying experience.
The military bureaucracy is frequently a fearsome thing. The glut of money over time has produced not only a daunting military-industrial complex but a lot of technocratic operational inefficiencies: a special office for this, a unique procedure for that, a command structure that doesn’t always reward competence.
The people who worked in my office, civilians and contractors like me plus the military staff, were decent, hardworking folks. There was an unwritten rule not to discuss politics, though nearly everyone was conservative. We did get into amicable political discussions over after-work beers. I learned how conservatives think.
In short, I discovered firsthand the strengths and weaknesses of our military. It has taken on all the virtues and failings of our government, but few recognize how hard and effectively its members work. They are anything but suckers and losers. For the bone spurs dropout to denigrate these people is one more demonstration of his depravity—and his political stupidity.
I agree with your assessment of our military, spot on as usual Mr. Goods!
Greneda?? How about Vietnam, Iraq (twice!), Afghanistan (ongoing after 19 years)?? The question is not are there good people in the military ( clearly!), but toward what ends is the multi trillion $$ US military might being employed? Might some (much!) of this $$ be spent on forming a more perfect union. Too often, the military is a lead footed extension of the foundationally embedded American colonial-capitalist enterprise.
T is too ignorant to appreciate this, so it would be a deeply satisfying irony if his gaffe costs him the election and leads to a long overdue rethinking of our military’s, indeed our nation’s, role in today’s world.
He might have been thinking he could rely upon military not to evict him from WH when he loses the election–now they will be first in line to drag him out!